05 November, 2011

Eve and Pandora

The following essay was written for my Myths and Legends class; where it mentions "class" and "lesson," that is what I am referring to:

                I have always found the myth of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from the Garden of Eden to be very interesting. Chapter three of the book of Genesis tells us how Eve, wife of Adam and formed of his rib, is seduced by the proffer of knowledge from a serpent. All she has to do is eat the fruit of the forbidden tree. Little does she know, the serpent is the devil in disguise. She offers some fruit to her husband and together they eat, effectively opening their eyes to the goods and evils of the world. They realize they are naked and clothe themselves in fig leaves. God sees that they have clothed themselves and asks them how they knew they were naked, and they admit to eating the fruit. God kicks them out of paradise, curses them until He runs out of ideas, and installs a divine security system so that His degenerate children may never return.
                Even as a child the contradictions inherent in this myth were apparent to me. If God is omnipotent and omniscient, why did He have to ask Adam and Eve why they were clothed? Should He not simply have known? The whole situation seems reminiscent of an episode of Psych: it is God’s observational skills that uncover the crime, not His professed ability to know all. Furthermore, if God is as loving a father as He claims to be, wouldn’t He want his children to be wise? Why try to force them into perpetual childhood? And since God is supposed to be all-knowing, wouldn’t He have known they would disobey him anyway?
               Not to mention that the Bible has always seemed (to me) to support a kind of Greco-Roman religious view beneath the Christian dogma. God says, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness (Genesis 1:26).” When He discovers Adam and Eve’s transgression, He says, “See, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever (Genesis 3:11).” This implies that God is not the only deity, but one of many; it also implies that divine status can be attained by a mortal. These are both characteristics of Greco-Roman mythology. But I digress; I was going to talk about how the themes in the story of Adam and Eve parallel those in a myth which has been discussed in class.
                The lesson described the myth of Pandora and Prometheus. The first obvious similarity is that this myth has some internal contradiction, as well. Perhaps contradiction is a theme all myths share! When Zeus offers Pandora to Prometheus, Prometheus knows it is a trick and so gives Pandora to his brother, Epimetheus. Since Prometheus is famous for his forethought, shouldn’t he realize that whatever danger Pandora might present would have a better chance of being contained or avoided in his own hands, rather than in the hands of his fool brother? Also, the myth does not follow the rules it presents. Pandora’s Box contained such evils as famine, poverty, and disease. While they were inside the box, humans did not experience these things. Only when they were released from the box did they begin to plague humanity. The myth also says that hope was inside the box, and that humans only retained the ability to hope because Pandora shut the box before hope escaped. If disease does not exist while inside the box, but does exist when released from the box, then shouldn’t the same be true for hope? Shouldn’t it exist only if it is released from the box, but not when contained inside it?
                While contradiction is a characteristic both myths share, it isn’t really a theme. I think the central theme in both of these myths is very important. Christian mythology tells us that most of the hardships in the world are the result of God’s curses on Adam and Eve. Basically, humans know suffering because Eve was curious. We see a similar theme in the myth of Pandora; once again, humanity suffers at the hands of a woman’s curiosity. This is how these myths have been presented to us, and this is how we believe them. But these viewpoints are biased at the hands of men. As I mentioned above, Prometheus has the power to prevent the disastrous events that occur – and though he lets it happen, we are urged to believe it is solely the woman’s fault. Eve offers the fruit of the tree of life to Adam, and he accepts it. Nowhere in the Bible do I see Adam arguing with Eve. He doesn’t urge her not to eat; he doesn’t take the fruit and throw it from her. He simply accepts the fruit and together they eat. Yet we are urged to believe this is solely the woman’s fault. When we set aside our biases to study these myths, shouldn’t we conclude that man and woman share the fault? No, I don’t believe we should.
                Let’s look closer. God created Adam, and later created Eve. He forbade them to eat the fruit of the tree of life, because He did not want them to be wise and to understand good and evil. He intentionally made Adam and Eve naïve. So when the serpent persuades Eve to eat from the tree, why shouldn’t she? She has no knowledge of deceit. She does not know what a lie is or why one might be told. God has left Eve defenseless against manipulation; and yet He punishes her when that vulnerability is exploited. Zeus made Pandora out of clay and asked the goddesses of Olympus to bestow their blessings upon her. This would have included Athena, the goddess of wisdom and the pursuit of knowledge (among other things). Zeus himself exploited a natural curiosity that he knew Pandora would have. In both of these myths, the blame lies with the deity in question. The Christian God denies humans wisdom and then punishes them for it. Zeus endangers humankind in a petty attempt to get even with Prometheus, and does so by exploiting a trait he made sure Pandora would have.
                So what should we call this theme? In both myths a deity unjustly punishes humanity for a woman’s perfectly understandable curiosity. Both myths condemn human curiosity, as though it were a sin. In reality, curiosity is the mother of invention; and together, these two qualities make humankind great.


Works Cited:
Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Edition. Grand Rapids, MI: World Publishing, 1997. Print.

"Myths and Legends: Prometheus & Pandora." Grey School of Wizardry. Web. 4 Nov. 2011.

04 November, 2011

Artemis

                I have had a difficult time finding a goddess I feel a connection with. It seems to come much easier with gods for me; a goddess connection eluded me for a long time. When I finally found it, it was with Artemis.
                Artemis is the maiden goddess; sister of Apollo; daughter of Zeus and Leto. She is the goddess of the hunt, of childbirth, and sometimes fertility. It is said that even as she was born, she turned around to deliver her twin brother. Ever after that she looked after girl children. When she was just a child, Artemis asked her father to bless her with lifelong virginity. She asked other boons of Zeus, such as her bow and silver arrows which were forged by the Cyclopes. Virgin nymphs were her favorite company. Oddly enough, Artemis had a soft spot for Pan, who was by and large the god form of male lust. This just demonstrates the humanlike imperfections that she, like most deities outside the realm of the Judeo-Christian mythos, was guilty of.
                One of the first things that drew me toward Paganism was how relatable the gods and goddesses were. Instead of an omnipotent, omnipresent, infallible God we have deities who can be overcome by lust, greed, pride, envy, and so on – just like humans can. Artemis is just as “guilty” of this as any other goddess. She and her brother killed all the children of Niobe, who bragged to Leto that she had brought more children into the world. When a hunter named Actaeon accidentally glimpsed Artemis and her cohorts bathing in the woods, she killed him a bit sadistically (transformed him into a stag to be killed by his own hounds). But, also like a human, Artemis was known to set aside her hubris and do great things: healing, aid in childbirth, and even showing mercy. When the hunter Orion was killed, she placed him in the stars. Like any woman, Artemis was complex and prone to contradictory behavior: she would just as soon aid a woman in childbirth as kill her in it.
Today she is still widely honored, specifically as Diana, by women who feel empowered by her defiance of that age-old popular belief: that a woman needs a man. While I appreciate Artemis’ independence from men, I can’t say that I feel empowered by it. I like men, and I don’t feel weak or any less of a woman for it. But what I really love about Artemis is that she manages to embody femininity while abstaining from bearing children.
                Most of the venerated goddesses of the past and present share a common trait; they are mothers. Whether they bore children or something more abstract (like fire or the Earth) it all comes down to that sacred power each woman has. I have encountered many women who feel that the choice not to bear children is borderline heretical. I feel that this is an archaic attitude! Birth is a miracle, to be sure. But when early civilizations first honored fertility goddesses, childbirth was an important factor to the survival of humankind. There were so few people then, and their hardships were many – they needed numbers. The situation has changed in the past two centuries. I am of the opinion that the Earth is populated enough without every woman being pressured to have children. Surely population building is less important today than, say, scientific research. There are so many miracles a woman is capable of performing aside from childbirth, and I think it’s a shame that we have yet to realize that together as a society. I myself do not wish to have children, even though I love them. I feel a calling and have a plan for my life, and motherhood just doesn’t feature. So I walk in Artemis’ footsteps, to a lesser extreme. I am content in my work and my contributions; I feel that my life is full without husband and child.
                All in all, Artemis possesses a power which is essential to any great deity; she is timeless. Women of any age, in any era, in any station in life or part of the world can look to Artemis for guidance.

Works cited:
Carlson, Kathie. Life's Daughter/Death's Bride: Inner Transformations through the Goddess Demeter/Persephone. Shambala, Boston, MA; 1997.
Farrar, Janet and Stuart. The Witches' God. Phoenix Publishing Inc., Blaine, WA; 1989.
Leadbetter, Ron. Artemis. http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/artemis.html October 29th, 2011.
Moura, Ann. New History of Witchcraft. Seventh House Publishing, The Woodlands, TX; 2007.

03 November, 2011

Thank the gods for GSW challenges

After my well-meaning posts that started this blog, I promptly forgot about it and reverted to my old ways. A few days ago I stumbled across a challenge on GSW which requires participants to maintain a blog or journal of some sort for two whole months - and it was just the kick in the pants I needed to pick up where I left off in this blog. 

I'm leaving up the two posts I made previously, both because I did mean them earnestly and I think they're worth reading, and as a reminder of the almost immediate failure of my first attempt. Let's hope I do better this time around!

05 February, 2011

Thoughts on Imbolc

While I might have let the sabbat pass me by, it's not too late to appreciate the meaning of Imbolc. Just a few hours ago I read this heartwarming article by Cliff Seruntine entitled "Promises of Imbolg" and it gave me something to think about it.

I've been walking around campus a lot lately, and here in northern New Jersey we've got lovely banks of ice-covered snow glistening as far as the eye can see. The sidewalks are all graced with either ice or a slightly-more-slippery layer of slush. The same sentiments emanate from everyone's lips: "When will it be spring?" and "I can't take anymore snow!" I have to wonder if I'm the only one truly enjoying what remains of the winter.

So when I consider the promises that Imbolc brings, I appreciate not only the imminent spring, but also the warning it gives us: winter is almost over, so enjoy the rest of it while you can.  As I write this I look out of my dorm window at a small patch of woods which is covered in a blanked of snow. The bare trees rise up between thick patches of fog. It's a peaceful kind of evening up on the mountain. I'm drinking in the last of the quiet before the sweet cacophony of spring!

There Comes a Time

We are living in an age of cripple. The technology we possess is a phenomenal blessing; but it is also a nigh-unshakable curse. Children born in and after my generation are growing up plugged in. Computers, the internet, social media, cell phones...all are so ingrained on us from the moment we figure out how to type that it becomes difficult to step away from the monitor. It's true that this technology is a miracle - a revolution sparks in Egypt and I, sitting in my dorm room in northern New Jersey, know about it five minutes later. At the same time I believe it diminishes our "selves." Emotionally, socially, and spiritually we suffer from our dependence on technology.

Three days ago Imbolc came...and went. I posted a status on Facebook to wish everyone a blessed Imbolc. That was the extent of my celebration. I am spiritually charged but systematically lazy. This needs to change. Not another sabbat will pass me by while I type away at a keyboard, catching up on news feeds and updating all my social networking mediums. Techno dependency is a disability which can at least be managed, if not overcome. This blog will be about religion, nature, spirituality, life, and tracking my journey to a more spiritual me.